🔗 Share this article

As any significant prize-giving event approaches, there’s always a clamor for introducing fresh award types to honor underappreciated efforts and satisfy the passions of enthusiasts with niche passions.

Another commentator has already made supporting a scary games classification. That would rule. The same goes for strategy board titles, this being a dedicated supporter's campaign. But they will have to forgive me when I prioritize because like all blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand stands as crucial above others. This is the request: We need an award type for logic-based games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; it’s very subjective, and typically start arguments and end in fuzzy definitions. There’s a reason cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. But it is an unavoidable compromise within the realm of video games, that demonstrate such variety they hardly constitute a single creative category.

To recognize the complete range of interactive entertainment excellence to gain proper attention, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, classification by type becomes crucial.

Existing Game Classification System

The major gaming awards offer these award types recognizing Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these award types actually cover numerous genres, allowing placement for numerous titles.

Different situation exists for brain-teasing titles. No appropriate category exists to accommodate them. Consider three of this year’s best games, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles in a particular game, the pulse-pounding block-matching from another release, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles published annually without proper recognition at major award shows, unless they happen to qualify award groups including Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive small studio competitions.

• An iconic brain-teaser got overlooked in any category during that awards season
• Another creative title was excluded during that ceremony
• Well-received sorting experience received no acknowledgment in 2021
• Just some puzzle games barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications

Significance of Puzzle Games

Frequently they represent compact experiences, but the art in brain-teasers carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games count as most engaged experiences worldwide continuing this trend for many years.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with well-known building titles for the title of highest-selling title ever; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones for gaming as medium, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.

Proposal and Rationale

Logic titles wouldn't face that issue. It would be easy to populate five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude so many good games out.

To emphasize again, these represent titles without proper classification at major gaming awards. Puzzle game makers function at the demanding boundary interactive creation, creating some of essential manifestations of gaming itself. Similar to film action specialists, they deserve recognition. Don't make them wait decades.