🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from violence, including family violence, following extensive and heated discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked broad protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially send back the bill for additional review if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence similar discussions in additional member states